Limitations of Skeptical Default Reasoning

نویسنده

  • Jens Doerpmund
چکیده

Poole has shown that nonmonotonic logics do not handle the lottery paradox correctly. In this paper we will show that Pollock's the­ ory of defeasible reasoning fails for the same reason: defeasible reasoning is incompatible with the skeptical notion of derivability.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Nonmonotonic Skeptical Consequence Relation in Constrained Default Logic

This paper presents a study of the nonmonotonic consequence relation which models the skeptical reasoning formalised by constrained default logic. The nonmonotonic skeptical consequence relation is defined using the sequent calculus axiomatic system. We study the formal properties desirable for a “good” nonmonotonic relation: supraclassicality, cut, cautious monotony, cumulativity, absorption, ...

متن کامل

Skeptical Rational Extensions

In this paper we propose a version of default logic with the following two properties: (1) defaults with mutually inconsistent justi-cations are never used together in constructing a set of default consequences of a theory; (2) the reasoning formalized by our logic is related to the traditional skeptical mode of default reasoning. Our logic is based on the concept of a skeptical rational extens...

متن کامل

Two Cumulativity Results on J-and Pj-default Logics

This paper reports two cumulativity results for J-and PJ-default logics formalized by Del-grande and Jackson Delgrande and Jackson, 1991] in the context of skeptical reasoning: (1) PJ-default logic is cumulative, and (2) J-default logic is not cumulative in general but there is a nontrivial class of theories for which the cumu-lativity property can still hold. We also investigate semantical imp...

متن کامل

Proof Complexity of Propositional Default Logic

Default logic is one of the most popular and successful formalisms for non-monotonic reasoning. In 2002, Bonatti and Olivetti introduced several sequent calculi for credulous and skeptical reasoning in propositional default logic. In this paper we examine these calculi from a proof-complexity perspective. In particular, we show that the calculus for credulous reasoning obeys almost the same bou...

متن کامل

Skeptical Query-Answering in Constrained Default Logic

An approach to skeptical query-answering in Constrained Default Logic based on the Connection Method is presented. We adapt a recently proposed general method to skeptical reasoning in Default Logics—a method which does neither strictly require the inspection of all extensions nor the computation of entire extensions to decide whether a formula is skeptically entailed. We combine this method wi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1997